(KAI CHENG, HONG YI AND KENRIC:3)You could actually try displaying how you got the 2x3 for part (a). Content is easy to understand as the questions are basically one-liners. If ofended, sorry.
The question was well taken and handwriting was neat. Presentation is clear.
Also, instead of putting the double slashes to indicate the answer, try ANS or £(hex) to indicate the answer
Sean, Nehal and Eunicecontent: The equation is accurate, and neat, but there is no working to show how they got that answer. Presentationthe handwriting is neat and easy to comprehend.As for the layout , it is well spaced and organised.
(KAI CHENG, HONG YI AND KENRIC:3)
ReplyDeleteYou could actually try displaying how you got the 2x3 for part (a). Content is easy to understand as the questions are basically one-liners. If ofended, sorry.
The question was well taken and handwriting was neat. Presentation is clear.
DeleteAlso, instead of putting the double slashes to indicate the answer, try ANS or £(hex) to indicate the answer
DeleteSean, Nehal and Eunice
ReplyDeletecontent:
The equation is accurate, and neat, but there is no working to show how they got that answer.
Presentation
the handwriting is neat and easy to comprehend.
As for the layout , it is well spaced and organised.